For obvious reasons, if you haven’t read part 1 and part 2 of this review, you might wish to do so, as I don’t have the space to recap here.
In the last third of Everything Must Change, Brian imagines ‘what it would be like to reevaluate, renew, and rebuild the three primary systems of our society [security, prosperity and equity],’ through the new framing story of the good news/kingdom of God, as set out by Jesus (p.155).
Though one might at times suggest that there is idealism and even speculation in what Brian writes, there is also a complex and considered engagement taking place, and nothing I can say here will do justice to the depth of the theological, political, social, and economic arguments being set out. Therefore, please don’t take my brevity as an indication that what Brian has done is sparse. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, having mulled it over, I’m going to opt to jump over Brian’s arguments re: security, prosperity and equity, and simply give a brief insight into the final section of the book: ‘A Revolution of Hope’, leaving you to read Brian for yourself.
Given all that’s gone before, Brian opens his final section with an obvious and pertinent question: Can the earth really be liberated from the destructive framing story that drives it? Is Jesus’ healing and transforming framing story really powerful enough to save the world? (p.277). And with beautiful honesty and as if to stifle overenthusiastic but ill-thought-through whoops of, ‘Yes! You Bet it is?’ Brian simply says – ‘nobody knows’. Having spent the last few hundred pages dealing with complexities and nuances, he clearly isn’t about to short-change the reader with a ‘let-go and let-God’ attitude to the global challenge facing us all. But then, neither is he about to hand over the problem to a politics of reason that’s devoid of any consideration of the Christ-event. This is an overtly Christological solution to global issues, with an implicit question at its center: what other kind of solution is there?
Brian suggests that at the heart of the crises is the issue of belief – do we really believe the framing story of Jesus? For what constitutes the power of any story is that we believe it. Challenging us that the, ‘framing story that dominates our world today has no power except the power we give it by believing it’ (p.278).
Effectively, what Brian is putting forward is a conversion from one dominating narrative to another, with the very future of the planet at stake.
Of course, such a conversion isn’t easy, because the current framing story doesn’t make it so, enticing us to keep faith with the current system by making big promises (p.279). Therefore, ‘Our great choice is whether or not we will dare to believe against the suicide machine, and believe Jesus, toward a different world (p.282).’ Proving what is perhaps hard to believe, that ‘believing is the most radical thing we can do’ (p.282).
Of course, belief (faith) without action, without a change in behavior is dead. Therefore, in line with the biblical metaphor of the ‘living sacrifice’, ‘We will give up the life we could have lived, the life we would have lived – pursuing pleasure, leisure, treasure, security, whatever. And instead, we will live a life dedicated to replacing the suicide machine with sacred ecosystems, beautiful community, an insurgency of healing and peace, a creative global family, an unterror movement of faith, hope, and love’ (p.286). For, as the title of this fascinating and challenging book suggests, the framing story of the good news and the kingdom of God means everything must change.
Some may find Brian’s latest book a radical departure from his previous writing. Indeed, some of his natural constituents may feel that they’ve lost a champion to the kind of issues that are being tackled by Jim Wallis, et al. Personally, I think there is a natural progression taking place here, from the New Kind of Christian trilogy into The Secret Message of Jesus and onto Everything Must Change. Which I guess means that there are potentially thousands of other Christians who are on a similar faith trajectory as Brian, making for exciting times ahead.
PS- For more info and details of Brian’s upcoming US tour go here: http://www.brianmclaren.net/





9 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 2, 2007 at 6:54 am
Rob
alan,
i agree with your last paragraph. it annoys me when people have a go at evangelicals or emergents for becoming green/peace – this isn’t hippyism but the heart of an applied and relevant Message. might we have to go beyond having organic coffee in our lattes and actually do something? belief MUST result on action.
i think there is a natural progression. the criticism of brian will always be from one group of people that he is not evangelical enough – but what about ‘evangelism as dance’ – i think this is the best book on evangelism out there!!! all he is doing now is fleshing out what a christian might do once they have been converted [from unbelief or pre-emergent!!!].
i am emphatically post-emergent and post-post-modern, fed up with taking the church out of modernity and wanting to get on with BEING and making a difference. will this new book reach to those outside the church with a similar heart – or is it written in defence of the emergent movement. if the latter, we should not care neither do they.
i enjoy progressions
rob
October 2, 2007 at 8:34 am
alanmann
Rob, thanks for this comment – I’m sure Brian will appreciate it, also.
I think the book has the potential to reach outside the church because it has some harsh things to say about the international political policy of the West (particularly the US) and our attitudes and culture more generally. I guess it will generate more interest outside the church Stateside, simply because of the way faith and politics are fused and the available outlets for debate. But that’s not to say, given the right circumstances, it couldn’t generate interest this side of the pond.
As far as I’m concerned, it’s certainly not a defence of the emergent movement.
October 2, 2007 at 5:38 pm
maria
I agree with Alan about the potential for this book to reach many outside the church. I really feel it was written for those on the political left, outside the church or on the fringes, especially those that have been involved in the anti-capitalist movement or the anti-globalization activism of the late 90s.
Even going into the book with a similar political mindset as Mclaren, I have to admit, it was still a mindblow to read an updated critique of capitalism written from a Christian perspective.
Anyway, thanks for doing these reviews. peace to you
October 4, 2007 at 12:40 pm
Tom Hohstadt
Looks like a good book and thank you for your review. You quote Brian with “(the) ‘framing story that dominates our world today has no power except the power we give it by believing it’ (p.278).” For me, this comes uncomfortable close to a “thinking man’s religion”. Perhaps, it should read, “…except the power we release in it by believing it.” This is a subtle but very important difference–the difference between the life and death of the emerging church movement.
Tom Hohstadt
http://www.FutureChurch.net
October 4, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Mark Hobbs
Excellent review Alan. I’ve been reading and reviewing this book on my blog as well, and I agree with your assessment. This book is quite different from his others, and I get the feeling all of the others were a prelude for this.
October 4, 2007 at 8:25 pm
jonathanbrink
Alan, thanks for the summary. It gave me enough to know that I have to read it without spoiling it.
I would suggest that what God is calling us to is not an idealist form of complete restoration of the world, but to begin restoring the world we live in. Belief that Brian is talking about is to begin that journey. It’s kind of like the boy who throws starfish in the sea. At least he’s saving “this” one.
October 5, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Paul
sounds like a challenging encouraging challenging book
I look forward to reading it! Thanks Alan for your review(s)!
October 10, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Trev
wow. sounds like a good book to read. not quite bed time reading! I do wonder and echo the question , are we ever able to make a ‘difference’ or does that very nuance smack of modernistic arrogance? I find it interesting that through Adam et al things did not work out (the flood), then Noah and it was his descendants that built the tower of babel and then of course finally Jesus as Brian says having to come an present a different narrative. The track record ain’t that good, if good becomes the narrative?
October 16, 2007 at 11:28 am
Helen
FYI here’s my review (the review of an ‘almost atheist’ fwiw).
Happily I heard about the US tour in time to find out Brian is giving an academic lecture 1/2 a mile from my house tonight so I’m going